This week’s reading came at a good time, as I am just
getting reading to start teaching argumentation in my classes. Elbow’s article,
albeit being long, was an interesting read. Elbow emphasizes the importance of
innovative writing order and emphasizes the importance of not getting too
caught up in things like thesis statements and logic. He also emphasizes the
importance of narrative in writing. I have noticed that in my classes, students
enjoy writing narrative essays so much better as they feel less inclined to get
too caught up in what they call “formal” writing, which sometimes makes papers
too redundant. I have stressed the importance of narrative in the exploratory
paper that they are working on, and I hope that by providing sample papers for
them to look at, I have made it clear what I expect when I say narrative. It is
also amazing to see how students don’t think that narrative based papers are
academic. They are so used to writing the same types of five paragraph papers
with thesis statement in the beginning, no use of “I’s”, three supporting
paragraphs and a short conclusion, that when a paper that requires narration on
their part is assigned, they get bewildered. They are not sure how to go about
it, and a paper that should otherwise be an easy task or at least a fun task
becomes this behemoth mission. Elbow’s article gives a huge importance to voice
in writing, and I feel when I wrote the first draft of my own exploratory
paper, I was missing that. I had to considerably revise my paper in the next
week, and one of the things I did was included a lot more narrative. Kroll’s
piece “Arguing Differently” caught my attention, because I am looking for
different ways to teach arguments and I thought the reading had some good
practical examples. I do think I can use some of the examples that he gives in
my classes, when I teach argumentation.
I was a bit surprised that my students had a hard time understanding the narrative in a the Exploratory Paper. I thought the Personal Narrative would have established this.
ReplyDelete