This week’s readings kept reminding
me of the digital humanities panel that we had on campus a few weeks ago and
also the discussions we have had about technology in the classroom. My exploratory
paper was actually trying to look into some of this new media as an aid to
enhance learning in a writing classroom. Also, our next assignment is also
related to new media, and I have had some heated debates with some of my
friends about the use of new media in the classroom, which made it a more
interesting reading week for me. Some of the exercises suggested Anne Frances
Wysocki looked very interesting to me, and I would really like to use them in
my classroom, and see if it works like it does for Wysocki’s classroom. I
really thought the article by Wysocki was really clever. I am not sure if I
understand the part about decreased emphasis on content and more emphasis on
the medium, but I guess, when we are working with the new media, the rhetorical
purpose of the medium and the form that the content uses becomes highly
influential on the message/content’s overall reception. Of course, Wysocki
wants us to emphasize new media more in our composition classroom, but it only
comes out as an ulterior motive. The argument makes it seems like just the
integration of new media into the classroom is not what Wycoski is ultimately
preaching.
Kavita, its interesting to me that the Wysocki, Selfe and Hooks essays are actually in conversation with each other. They are each trying to get us to open up the way we approach literacy. I mean isn't it interesting how they approach race, gender and class issues in the classroom. I appreciate Wysocki (and Selfe) saying "hey new technologies, doesn't mean new freedom." All three women are looking for, "a revolution in the landscape of communication." Is it an accident these essays were written by women?
ReplyDelete