I am
very interested in visual literacy, and whether and to what extent it should be
taught in the college composition classroom.
I agree with many of the sentiments expressed by Selfe, in particular
the increased presence of visually relayed messages in mainstream culture. However, as much as I enjoy teaching visual
literacy, and as important as I believe it is for students to learn, I am
plagued by a number of questions. Is it
possible to find a balance between the teaching of visual literacy and
traditional “alphabet” based literacy in the composition classroom? Is it worth teaching visual literacy if it
means sacrificing, in any way, the teaching of traditional literacy? Does our teaching of visual literacy
undermine, or better yet, completely shift our purposes and goals in teaching
composition?
On a
practical level, I was struck by Selfe’s discussion of teacher preparedness to
actually teach visual literacy, and not just the ability read and interpret
visual texts, but to create and compose them as well. I am definitely not as computer savvy as I
once was, and I am totally out of touch with many of the computer programs Selfe
mentions in the article. If we teach
students about rhetoric and composition by having them do it themselves, then
it makes sense that we would use the same approach to teaching visual literacy
– we would have student compose multimedia and multimodal documents. But as I have mentioned, I am not
sufficiently prepared to assist students in using these more advanced computer
programs to design such documents.
I'll be interested to see how you incorporate comics (which is what you mean, I take it, when you say "visual literacy", because, come on) into your 1000 level class, particularly how the students engage in the material.
ReplyDelete