The notion that “writing
is a process” seems to have become the motto of many composition
instructors. The question that this
motto suggests is – a process for what?
A process for producing a research paper? For writing online blog responses? For composing a business resume? Do we grade our students based on what they
produce, or do we grade them based on their participation in the process? Do the ends justify the means, or do the
means justify the ends? Emig’s article
seems to suggest that we take a step back and view writing as a practice that
we use not only to develop our composition and rhetoric skills, but as an
undertaking which can help us to learn – period.
I often tell my students that if I could make them read
all through class and simply assign different readings as homework, they would
ultimately learn infinitely more than what I teach them in class. I honestly believe this to be true. The act of reading seems to act somewhat
subconsciously upon us, and we learn and develop almost without noticing. What I believe Emig is suggesting in this
piece is that writing functions in a similar manner. Writing provides students with a mode or
method of thinking that is alternative to internal thought or even peer to peer
discussion. I have found that brief
writing exercises at the beginning of my classes allows students to get their
thoughts up and running, and makes the ensuing discussion much more productive.
No comments:
Post a Comment